Functional improvements of patients admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility after bilateral lung transplant due to severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has introduced a new subset of patients with acute end-stage lung damage for which lung transplantation has been successfully performed. OBJECTIVE: To describe the inpatient rehabilitation course of patients who underwent bilateral lung transplant due to severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Free-standing, academic, urban inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen patients aged 28-67 years old (mean 53.9 ± 10.7) who developed COVID-19 respiratory failure and underwent bilateral lung transplant. INTERVENTIONS: Patients participated in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program including physical, occupational, and speech therapy tailored to the unique functional needs of each individual. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures of functional improvements, include mobility and self-care scores on section GG of the Functional Abilities and Goals of the Improving Post-Acute Care Transformation Act, as defined as quality measures by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Other functional measures included 6 minute walk test, Berg balance scale, Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), and Cognition and Memory Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores. Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used to evaluate statistical significance of change between admission and discharge scores. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed inpatient rehabilitation. Self-care (GG0130) mean score improved from 20.9 to 36.1. Mobility (GG0170) mean score improved from 30.7 to 70.7. Mean 6-minute walk distance improved from 174.1 to 467.6 feet. Mean Berg balance scores improved from 18.6/56 to 36.3/56. MASA scores improved from 171.3 to 182.3. All functional measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements with p value ≤ .008, except for cognition and memory FIM scores, which did not show a statistically significant difference. A majority (76%) of patients discharged home. CONCLUSION: This new and unique patient population can successfully participate in a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program and achieve functional improvements despite medical complications.

Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: Identifying opportunities for remote care.

Use of telehealth has grown substantially in recent times due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Remote care services may greatly benefit patients with disabilities; chronic conditions; and neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain disorders, thereby allowing continuity of rehabilitation care, reducing barriers such as transportation, and minimizing COVID-19 exposure. In March 2020, our rehabilitation hospital, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, launched a HIPAA-compliant telemedicine program for outpatient and day rehabilitation clinics and telerehabilitation therapy programs. The objective of this study was to examine patients' experiences and satisfaction with telemedicine in the rehabilitation physician practice, including novel virtual multidisciplinary evaluations. The present study examines survey data collected from 157 patients receiving telemedicine services at Shirley Ryan AbilityLab from December 2020-August 2021. Respondents were 61.8% female, predominantly White (82.2%) with ages ranging across the lifespan (69.4% over age 50 years). Diagnostic categories of the respondents included: musculoskeletal conditions 28%, chronic pain 22.3%, localized pain 10.2%, neurological conditions 26.8%, and Parkinson's and movement disorders 12.7%. Survey responses indicate that the telemedicine experiences were positive and well received. The majority of participants found these services easy to use, effective, and safe, and were overall satisfied with the attention and care they received from the providers-even for those who had not previously used telehealth. Respondents identified a variety of benefits, including alleviating financial and travel-related burdens. There were no significant differences in telehealth experiences or satisfaction across the different clinical diagnostic groups. Respondents viewed the integrated physician and rehabilitation therapist telehealth multidisciplinary model favorably, citing positive feedback regarding receiving multiple perspectives and recommendations, feeling like an integrated member of their healthcare team, and having a comprehensive, holistic team approach along with effective communication. These findings support that telemedicine can provide an effective care model in physiatry (physical medicine and rehabilitation) clinics, across different neurological, musculoskeletal, and pain conditions and in multidisciplinary team care settings. The insights provided by the present study expand our understanding of patient experiences with remote care frameworks for rehabilitation care, while controlling for institutional variation, and ultimately will help provide guidance regarding longer term integration of telemedicine in physiatry and multidisciplinary care models.

The Relationship Between Patient-Specific Factors and Discharge Destination After COVID-19 Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the discharge destinations and associated patient-specific factors among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a single-site tertiary acute care hospital. RESULTS: Among 2872 patients, discharge destination included home without services ( n = 2044, 71.2%), home with services ( n = 379, 13.2%), skilled nursing facility (117, 4.1%), long-term acute care hospital ( n = 39, 1.3%), inpatient rehabilitation facility ( n = 97, 3.4%), acute care facility ( n = 23, 0.8%), hospice services ( n = 20, 0.7%), or deceased during hospitalization ( n = 153, 5.3%). Adjusting by covariates, patients had higher odds of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care hospital, or inpatient rehabilitation facility) than home (with or without services) when they were older (odds ratio [OR], 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-3.11; P < 0.001), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3-6: OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.34-4.15; P = 0.003; ≥7: OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.56-4.86; P < 0.001), were intubated or required critical care (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.48-3.13; P < 0.001), or had a longer hospitalization (3-7 days: OR, 12.48; 95% CI, 3.77-41.32; P < 0.001; 7-14 days: OR, 28.14; 95% CI, 8.57-92.43; P < 0.001). Patients were less likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility if they received remdesivir (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization should be considered by physicians when prognosticating patient rehabilitation.